The reunification of the Parthenon Marbles. A European Concern
Par :Formats :
Actuellement indisponible
Cet article est actuellement indisponible, il ne peut pas être commandé sur notre site pour le moment. Nous vous invitons à vous inscrire à l'alerte disponibilité, vous recevrez un e-mail dès que cet ouvrage sera à nouveau disponible.
- Nombre de pages86
- PrésentationBroché
- Poids0.158 kg
- Dimensions15,9 cm × 24,0 cm × 0,5 cm
- ISBN978-2-8027-4724-6
- EAN9782802747246
- Date de parution02/12/2014
- CollectionCentre Européen de la Culture
- ÉditeurBruylant (Emile)
Résumé
The Parthenon is far more than a unique historical building, the national symbol of Greece and the highest cultural accomplishment of its people. It is also a major monument of European civilization and a powerful reminder of mankind's enduring values of democracy, freedom and personal liberty, and as such has long been a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The authors of this book stress that the Parthenon Marbles should be reunited in their original geographical and cultural context.
They underline the uniqueness of this restitution claim which concerns the reunification of the architectural parts of a symbolic monument and therefore does not constitute a precedent.
They underline the uniqueness of this restitution claim which concerns the reunification of the architectural parts of a symbolic monument and therefore does not constitute a precedent.
The Parthenon is far more than a unique historical building, the national symbol of Greece and the highest cultural accomplishment of its people. It is also a major monument of European civilization and a powerful reminder of mankind's enduring values of democracy, freedom and personal liberty, and as such has long been a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The authors of this book stress that the Parthenon Marbles should be reunited in their original geographical and cultural context.
They underline the uniqueness of this restitution claim which concerns the reunification of the architectural parts of a symbolic monument and therefore does not constitute a precedent.
They underline the uniqueness of this restitution claim which concerns the reunification of the architectural parts of a symbolic monument and therefore does not constitute a precedent.